Rachel Lovett
105 matches · 74W–31L · seasons 2025–2026
Captains: add Rachel Lovett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history105 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Teams42 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
50%
4W–4L · 58.4% of games
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 64.9% of games
3.5
92.5%
37W–3L · 65.9% of games
4.0
46.2%
18W–21L · 49.7% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
80%
8W–2L · 61% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#1 Singles
12%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.