← Search

Ike High

Mount Pleasant, SC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 30W–17L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ike High to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
W
2026-03-14 · LCTA (A) 4.5M 40 & Over (Shelley) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Blair Jennings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-03-01 · LCTA18/Cladakis/MPR · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brandon Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-14 · LCTA (A) 4.5M 40 & Over (Shelley) · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Kiesel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-08-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mike Cladakis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-12 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-03-15 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brent Michael
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-02-15 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with William Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-01-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Blair Jennings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-10-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Zeppernick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2024-08-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with John Bumgarner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2024-08-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with William Shelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dirk van der Windt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 58.8% of games
4.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 47.7% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.1% of games
8.5
50%
6W–6L · 48.3% of games
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#1 Singles
17%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal