← Search

Ramandeep Arora

— year-end
114 matches · 68W–46L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ramandeep Arora to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2026-08-30 · TOC.Jayashankaran · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hugh Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Scott Hoffman / Michael Wangen
2026-08-23 · TOC.Jayashankaran · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rishi Tandon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · NMAC.Tandon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nagarajan Janagar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
John Kelly / Anthony Li
2026-06-26 · NMAC.Tandon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nagarajan Janagar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · with Rishi Tandon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · TOC.Deivasigamani · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Parikshith Chada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-25 · TOC.Deivasigamani · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Syam Siripurapu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-11 · TOC.Deivasigamani · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rishi Tandon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-10 · TOC.Deivasigamani · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rajshekar Chandraprakash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-03-25 · NMAC.Tandon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rishi Tandon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · NMAC.Tandon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rishi Tandon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-21 · TOC.Deivasigamani · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rishi Tandon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
Teams25 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
68.6%
24W–11L · 59.9% of games
3.5
43.8%
21W–27L · 46.9% of games
6.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 70.9% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova