← Search

Jane Gardner

Springfield, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 57W–40L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jane Gardner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
L
2026-06-25 · MO/Rollins/40&Over3.5W · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Rollins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · MO/Rollins/40&Over3.5W · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-28 · MO/Rollins/40&Over3.5W · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Rollins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · Huong Doan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · Huong Doan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Gravatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-25 · Huong Doan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Rollins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-07 · Huong Doan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-04 · Carol Rollins · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Jewell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-09-15 · Carol Rollins · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Barnard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-08 · Carol Rollins · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Barnard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-29 · MO/Cox40&Over3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Onnen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2025-07-23 · MO/Rollins/40&Over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tami Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 61.7% of games
3.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 56.4% of games
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 45.5% of games
7.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 47% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44% of games
7.0mixed
62.9%
22W–13L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
19 matches
#1 Singles
14%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
5 matches
#5 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova