← Search

Megan Sultan

— year-end
114 matches · 72W–42L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Megan Sultan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
W
2026-07-22 · IL - Furgal - Summer Crush · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Collier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · IL - Furgal - Summer Crush · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Furgal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-3
L
2026-07-01 · McManus - McChang · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Garrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-25 · IL - Furgal - Summer Crush · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Karen Sullivan / Tammy Tiko
2026-06-24 · McManus - McChang · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Nix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-12 · IL - Furgal - Summer Crush · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-10 · McManus - McKane · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Auyang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-4
W
2026-06-08 · Furgal - Spring Crush - Ida Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-05 · McManus - McKane · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-03 · McManus - McKane · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-19 · Furgal - Spring Crush - Ida Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathleen Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · Hopkins-Sultan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dante Paragas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-1
Teams64 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
69.2%
27W–12L · 58.5% of games
3.5
63%
29W–17L · 56.2% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
33 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert