← Search

Tanja Battle

— year-end
87 matches · 35W–52L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Tanja Battle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-09-12 · JDS-D Johnson 3.0 SAT · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-29 · JDS-D Johnson 3.0 SAT · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · JDS-D Johnson 3.0 SAT · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hilary Ellwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-21 · JDS WALLER · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Alli Sova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-20 · JDS WALLER · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lauren Mauldin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · JDS WALLER · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Alli Sova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-23 · JDS WALLER · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Debra Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-04 · MATA/Dana Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
Laura Jones / Julie Register
2026-03-28 · MATA/Dana Johnson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-26 · JDS-BROWN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janine Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-23 · HOCO-JOHNSON · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angie Barajas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-14 · MATA/Dana Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Teams34 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
41%
32W–46L · 46.1% of games
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 42.3% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
23 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova