← Search

Soh Jeong Kim

— year-end
107 matches · 97W–10L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Soh Jeong Kim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
W
2026-08-08 · Team Hirshberg (CONFIRMED)* · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Calley Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-3
W
2026-08-08 · Team Hirshberg (CONFIRMED)* · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jody Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-4
W
2026-08-08 · Team Hirshberg (CONFIRMED)* · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marcy Hirshberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-4
W
2026-07-21 · Rivermoore (Calley Willis)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Calley Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Hedges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-07 · Rivermoore (Calley Willis)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Calley Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-30 · Rivermoore (Calley Willis)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Calley Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · Rivermoore (Calley Willis)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Calley Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · Doublegate (Arlene Petrie)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Calley Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aimee Flores
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · Rivermoore (Calley Willis)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Calley Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 3-2
Teams16 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
95%
38W–2L · 72.3% of games
4.0
90.6%
48W–5L · 66.8% of games
4.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 60.5% of games
8.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
19 matches
#1 Singles
17%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert