← Search

Markus Pilsl

— year-end
121 matches · 66W–55L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Markus Pilsl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Webster/LF/tri 4.5M · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Troy Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-13 · Webster/LF/tri 4.5M · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Troy Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-05 · James/LF/tri4.0M · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Scot Holcombe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-04 · Webster/LF/tri 4.5M · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Chuy Socarro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-30 · James/LF/tri4.0M · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Rick Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-22 · James/LF/tri4.0M · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Rick Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · Webster/LF/tri 4.5M · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Chuy Socarro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · James/LF/tri4.0M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Enterline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · James/LF/tri4.0M · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Matt Epperson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · James/TU/3.5M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Troy Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
John Lee / Shawn Grant
2026-06-03 · James/TU/3.5M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-12 · James/TU/3.5M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Teams20 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 47.8% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
57.8%
52W–38L · 54.9% of games
4.0
50%
6W–6L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 47% of the time
#1 Singles
47%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
13 matches
#2 Singles
11%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal