← Search

Erin Moran

Danville, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 4W–8L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Erin Moran to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history12 matches
W
2026-06-03 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5B · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5B · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-10 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5B · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-26 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5B · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leda Lim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-18 · MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5B · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Bach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-23 · GREENBROOK RS 18MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joe Moss mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-10 · GREENBROOK RS 18MX6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joe Moss mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-14 · DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5C · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-19 · DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5C · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-10 · DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5C · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-21 · DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 18AW3.5C · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Cooke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-03 · GREENBROOK RS 18MX6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Aurelius mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 52% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
5 matches
#1 Singles
17%
2 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
2 matches
#2 Singles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova