← Search

Shelby Tuttle

— year-end
40 matches · 27W–13L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Shelby Tuttle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-09-14 · Palma Ceia Ad Ins/Kemp · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Annis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-10 · Palma Ceia Dream Team/Jackson · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-08 · HCC/Eicholtz · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Abby DeLaquil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · HCC/Eicholtz · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Heather Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-18 · HCC/Eicholtz · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Annis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · HCC/Eicholtz · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Eicholtz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · HCC/Eicholtz · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Annis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-18 · Palma Ceia / Kemp · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Annis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Jennifer Seminara / Monica Martinez
2026-05-16 · McMullen Kosar · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Stuart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Palma Celia/DreamTeam/ L. Jackson · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-27 · Palma Ceia / Kemp · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-14 · Palma Ceia / Kemp · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Annis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
Teams21 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
83.3%
25W–5L · 63.7% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#1 Singles
8%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal