← Search

Tania Kent

— year-end
47 matches · 26W–21L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Tania Kent to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Flames · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Yoder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-26 · Skyball · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · Flames · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · Skyball · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · Flames · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · Flames · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
KATHERINE GILLIGAN / Kristen Williams
2026-02-26 · Acing Gracefully · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hope Jay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-02-20 · Flames · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julia Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-02-15 · Flames · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-11 · Acing Gracefully · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vicki Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-02-07 · Flames · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vicki Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-02-01 · Flames · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Gallegos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Teams29 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 58.2% of games
3.0
51.3%
20W–19L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
4 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova