← Search

Sara Liles

— year-end
53 matches · 32W–21L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Sara Liles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Old Overton - Shoultz/McCarley 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aria Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-11 · PRC - Lyons 3.5 Friday · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-07 · PRC - Lyons 6.5D · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robyn Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · PRC - Lyons · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robyn Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-3
W
2026-07-30 · Old Overton - Key · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne McCarley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-16 · PRC - Lyons · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shena Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-07-10 · PRC - Lyons 6.5D · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robyn Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · Hoover Met - BOWDEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leanne McWilliams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · PRC -Lyons · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Hardaway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · Hoover Met - BOWDEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leanne McWilliams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · Hoover Met - BOWDEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aimee Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-28 · Hoover Met - BOWDEN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jackie Bee Currie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
73.9%
17W–6L · 58% of games
3.5
47.6%
10W–11L · 48.4% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 60.8% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 34% of the time
#1 Singles
34%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King