← Search

David Hafner

Austin, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 56W–50L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add David Hafner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
L
2026-08-02 · velox 40+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Montgomery mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · velox 40+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Summer Rydel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · velox 40+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Montgomery mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-03-28 · River Place Blue Ballers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dwight Bostic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-26 · River Place Blue Ballers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Rumaner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-21 · River Place Blue Ballers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marcus Hafner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-21 · River Place Blue Ballers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Farrar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-19 · River Place Blue Ballers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Kotlarz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · River Place Blue Ballers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Farrar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-03-08 · RP 4.0 Big Ballers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Rumaner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · RP 4.0 Big Ballers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kent Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-07 · River Place Blue Ballers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marcus Hafner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 76.6% of games
3.5
64.7%
22W–12L · 55.9% of games
4.0
45.6%
26W–31L · 49.6% of games
8.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.1% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
25 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer