← Search

Mary Cordero

Miami, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
141 matches · 90W–51L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Mary Cordero to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
W
2026-07-29 · Shores Summer Slammers · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mary Maxwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-22 · Shores Summer Slammers · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Voell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · Shores Summer Slammers · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Raegan Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Veronica Flores
2026-06-23 · Mary Cordero · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Natalie Alexander
2026-06-21 · Mary Cordero · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Melissa Guanche
2026-06-20 · Mary Cordero · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-17 · Mary Cordero · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-11 · Mary Cordero · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-24 · Chamizo (Dante Fascell) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-17 · Chamizo (Dante Fascell) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-04-10 · Chamizo (Dante Fascell) · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-06 · #3 Doubles · with Maria Celeste Arraras championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 59.1% of games
3.0
64.4%
65W–36L · 55.5% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
87.5%
14W–2L · 69.3% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 65.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
39 matches
#1 Singles
24%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
24 matches
#2 Singles
10%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova