← Search

Lauren Shade

— year-end
84 matches · 30W–54L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Lauren Shade to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Shade-Bade (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lizzie Bernius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-03 · McDonald/Overserved (S) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Xiaorong Liu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · Shade/Bade (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Diefenbach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Janice Peterson / Rebecca Lewis
2026-04-19 · McDonald/Overserved (S) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Laura Baum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-19 · Shade/Bade (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Malak Itani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-12 · McDonald/Overserved (S) · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-12 · Shade/Bade (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jackie Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-21 · McDonald/Overserved (S) · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · Shade/Bade (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lizzie Bernius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · Shade/Bade (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tina Bade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-07 · Shade/Bade (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jackie Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-01 · Shade/Bade (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Baum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Teams17 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
69.2%
18W–8L · 57% of games
3.0
16.3%
8W–41L · 39.3% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#1 Singles
8%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer