← Search

Clay Anderson

Pensacola, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 40W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Clay Anderson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-09-08 · O'Neill - PCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with James Craft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · Richardson - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew O'Neill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-30 · O'Neill - PCC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Natalie Mcelhany mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
Wendy Williams / Jeff Williams
2026-08-07 · O'Neill - PCC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Grace Harvey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · Tran - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Myra Huggins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-21 · Tran - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Myra Huggins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · O'Neill - PCC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Wilson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-10 · Craft - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JOHNNY DICKSON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · Bingert - PAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grant Gaston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-05 · Craft - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick Farkas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-28 · Anderson - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew O'Neill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-10 · Escambia/Anderson · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick Farkas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 71% of games
3.5
68.2%
15W–7L · 61% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.1% of games
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 60.4% of games
3.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 56.5% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 61.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal