← Search

Katie Brisbois

— year-end
95 matches · 50W–45L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Katie Brisbois to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Houston Christian - All In · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Noriko Abe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · LLTC - Try Us · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tiffany King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-18 · LLTC - Queens of the Court · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sara Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · LLTC - Queens of the Court · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jaron Santelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-05 · Houston Christian - All In · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jill Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-29 · Houston Christian - All In · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jill Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-22 · LLTC - Try Us · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Essence Nixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · LLTC - Queens of the Court · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sara Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · Missouri City - Love All · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mari Saiki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-21 · HFTC - Hot Shots · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Brisbois mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-19 · Missouri City - Love All · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-13 · Missouri City - Love All · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Teams27 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 54.3% of games
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
67.9%
19W–9L · 56.2% of games
4.0
42.4%
14W–19L · 48.3% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 52.8% of games
8.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
21 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#3 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova