← Search

Sarah Midgley

Jeffersonton, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 33W–64L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Sarah Midgley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
L
2026-08-28 · CF - Trifecta · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ingrid Hunsicker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-18 · CF - Trifecta · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Flikeid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-04 · CF - Trifecta · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-06-12 · CF - Nilsson - All In!! · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-08 · Team 2 Love & Deuces 3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-3
L
2026-06-04 · Butler - Glam Slam · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-30 · Team 3 Love & Deuces 3.0 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-4
L
2026-05-23 · Team 3 Love & Deuces 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-18 · Team 2 Love & Deuces 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ami Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · Team 3 Love & Deuces 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-3
W
2026-05-12 · Butler - Glam Slam · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-09 · Team 2 Love & Deuces 3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 75.4% of games
2.5
50%
9W–9L · 53.4% of games
3.0
25.9%
15W–43L · 41.2% of games
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 33% of the time
#2 Singles
33%
32 matches
#1 Singles
23%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
16 matches
#3 Singles
12%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova