← Search

Brooke Cusumano Cacciarelli

Saint Louis, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 66W–24L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Brooke Cusumano Cacciarelli to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Hoxsey 4.0W (F) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-19 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-12 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-22 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-03 · Kantrovitz (SD) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-03-01 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-02-22 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-02-17 · Kantrovitz (SD) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-15 · Hoxsey 4.0W (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-5, 0-1
W
2026-01-20 · Kantrovitz (SD) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 88.9% of games
3.0
100%
13W–0L · 64.4% of games
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 65.7% of games
4.0
68.8%
33W–15L · 59.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 52% of the time
#1 Singles
52%
47 matches
#2 Singles
18%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer