← Search

Belinda Denning

Westfield, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
227 matches · 155W–72L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Belinda Denning to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history227 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Curtiss
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-5, 0-1
L
2026-09-09 · High Tri W IRCD Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lesley Cahalan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
Katie Dillon / Susan Nixon
2026-08-31 · Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karyn ODonnell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-30 · Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mae Joubert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-17 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deborah Kuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-08-16 · Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mae Joubert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-13 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Whitsett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-10 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Pruitt · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deborah Burton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-03 · Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Gehring
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Vicki Valandra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martha Harker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Allison Gritton / Elizabeth Ball
2026-07-20 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Pruitt · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Pruitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2023–2026
CIN A40 4.0W TU IRCD Faulkenberg
Early Start Fall CITA Indy Adult 40 & Over · CITA Indy 40 & Over 4.0 Women, F · 40+
2026
CIN A40 4.5W IRCD Thompson
Early Start Fall CITA Indy Adult 40 & Over · CITA Indy 40 & Over 4.5 Women, F · 40+
2026
High Tri W IRCD Pruitt
Late Summer USTA Central Indiana Tri-Level · CIN Indy Women's Tri-Level 4.0/4.5/5.0
2026
Indy 7.5W SAT IRCD Pruitt
Spring USTA Central Indiana Combo · CIN Indy Combo 7.5 Women, SP
2026
Indy 8.5W IRCD Thompson
Spring USTA Central Indiana Combo · CIN Indy Combo 8.5 Women, SP
2026
Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg
Summer USTA Central Indiana Adult 18 & Over · CIN Indy 18 & Over 4.0 Women, S · 18+
2026
Indy A18 4.0W SUN IRCD Faulkenberg
Winter USTA Central Indiana Adult 18 & Over · CITA Indy 18 & Over 4.0 Women, W · 18+
2026
Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg
Summer USTA Central Indiana Adult 40 & Over · CIN Indy 40 & Over 4.0 Women, S · 40+
2026
Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Pruitt
Summer USTA Central Indiana Adult 55 & Over · CIN Indy 55 & Over 7.0 Women, S · 55+
2026
Indy A55 7.0W IRCD Pruitt
Spring USTA Central Indiana Adult 55 & Over · CIN Indy 55 & Over 7.0 Women, W · 55+
2026
Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Pruitt
Summer USTA Central Indiana Adult 55 & Over · CIN Indy 55 & Over 8.0 Women, S · 55+
2026
Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Pruitt
Spring USTA Central Indiana Adult 55 & Over · CIN Indy 55 & Over 8.0 Women, W · 55+
2026
Indy C 7.5W IRCD Faulkenberg
Fall USTA Central Indiana Combo Adult · CIN Indianapolis Combo 7.5 Women, F
2026
Indy C 8.5W IRCD Thompson
Fall USTA Central Indiana Combo Adult · CIN Indianapolis Combo 8.5 Women, F
2026
Indy X40 7.0 IRCD Inselberg
Spring USTA Central Indiana Mixed 40 & Over · CIN Indy Mixed 40 & Over 7.0, SP · 40+
2026
Mid Tri W IRCD Faulkenberg
Late Summer USTA Central Indiana Tri-Level · CIN Indy Women's Tri-Level 3.5/4.0/4.5
2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 59.5% of games
3.5
83.9%
26W–5L · 71.4% of games
4.0
64.2%
43W–24L · 55.6% of games
4.5
50%
4W–4L · 45.8% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 73.3% of games
7.0
94.1%
16W–1L · 66.2% of games
7.5
67.9%
19W–9L · 58.8% of games
8.0
53.3%
16W–14L · 53.5% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.4% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 50.5% of games
8.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 26% of the time
#1 Singles
26%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
42 matches
#2 Singles
6%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams