← Search

Elise Bergman

Chicago, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
174 matches · 73W–101L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Elise Bergman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history174 matches
W
2026-09-12 · CHI E 18W3.5 8.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Kazarian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-17 · CDTA S ComboW7.5 3.Gnvw Sangal Mon 7 $21 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Morgan Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Rachel Fuller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-21 · CDTA S 40&OW4.0 6.RT Fuller Sun 12 $27 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · CDTA S 18&OW4.0 4.Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Kosenkova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-5
L
2026-07-14 · CDTA S 18&OW4.0 4.Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Illana Hodges
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-07-12 · CDTA S 18&OW3.5 7.Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $22 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-11 · CDTA S 40&OW4.0 6.RT Fuller Sun 12 $27 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-24 · CDTA S 18&OW3.5 7.Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $22 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-2, 1-0
W
Jennifer Lee / Lisa Capp
2026-06-01 · CDTA S ComboW7.5 3.Gnvw Sangal Mon 7 $21 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Morgan Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-31 · CDTA S 40&OW4.0 6.RT Fuller Sun 12 $27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Yolande Borden / Michael Costello
2026-05-16 · CDTA S ComboX7.5 1.MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Charles Ahn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2022–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 8.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24
ESL 18 & Over · Women 3.5 · 18+
2027
CHI E 18W4.0 7.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24
ESL 18 & Over · Women 4.0 · 18+
2027
CHI E 40W4.0 2.RT Fuller Sun 12 $29
ESL 40 & Over · Women 4.0 · 40+
2027
CDTA E 18&OW3.5 8Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22
CDTA ESL 18 & Over · CDTA E 18&O Women 3.5 · 18+
2026
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 4Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22
CDTA ESL 18 & Over · CDTA E 18&O Women 4.0 · 18+
2026
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 5RT Greenberg Sun 6 $27
CDTA ESL 40 & Over · CDTA E 40&O Women 3.5 · 40+
2026
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 3RT Fuller Sun 2 $27
CDTA ESL 40 & Over · CDTA E 40&O Women 4.0 · 40+
2026
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 7.Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $22
1Summer 18&O WN/WE · Women 3.5 · 18+
2026
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 4.Nielsen Bergman Sun 3 $22
1Summer 18&O WN/WE · Women 4.0 · 18+
2026
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 6.RT Fuller Sun 12 $27
1Summer 40&O WN/WE · Women 4.0 · 40+
2026
CDTA S ComboW7.5 3.Gnvw Sangal Mon 7 $21
1Summer Combo WN/WE · Women 7.5
2026
CDTA S ComboX7.5 1.MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.5
1Summer Combo Mix WN/WE · Mixed 7.5
2026
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 10.Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22
CDTA 1Winter 18 & Over W/E · CDTA 18 & Over W 3.5 Winter · 18+
2026
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 9.Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22
CDTA 1Winter 18 & Over W/E · CDTA 18 & Over W 4.0 Winter · 18+
2026
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 1.RT Fuller Sun 12 $27
CDTA 1Winter 40 & Over W/E · CDTA 40 & Over W 4.0 Winter · 40+
2026
CDTA W ComboW7.5 1.Gnvw Sangal Sun 5 $21
CDTA 1Winter Combo · CDTA Combo W 7.5 Winter
2026
CDTA W ComboX7.5 1.MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.5
CDTA 1Winter Combo Mixed · CDTA Combo Mix 7.5 Winter
2026
CHI F CX7.5 2.MTC Brown Sat 7 $34.5
Fall Combo Mixed · Mixed 7.5
2026
NITA W 75CWe Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
2026 NITA2 Winterz Combo 18 & Over · NITA Winter 7.5 Combo Women · 18+
2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
48.6%
18W–19L · 49.9% of games
3.5
41.8%
23W–32L · 49.6% of games
4.0
30.3%
10W–23L · 37.4% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 70.3% of games
6.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 56.5% of games
7.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 46.6% of games
7.5mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
48 matches
#1 Singles
8%
14 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams