← Search

David Potter

Mobile, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 27W–96L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add David Potter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
L
2026-09-09 · MTC - Alexander · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gray Weinacker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-09-03 · MTC - Alexander · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darryl Neese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-02 · MTC - Alexander · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brad Coggin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-22 · MTC- Alexander/Cochran · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Robert Kohrman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-01 · MTC- Alexander/Cochran · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Robert Kohrman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-13 · MTC - Curtis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amber Martenstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-11 · MTC - Curtis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Reid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-03 · MTC - Curtis · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amber Martenstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
John Davis / John Peavy
2026-04-08 · MTC - Bayat/Denson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Aldacosta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-11 · MTC - Bayat/Denson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Aldacosta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-26 · MTC - Long/Denson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Upton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-23 · MTC - Bayat · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abu Raheem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
20.3%
13W–51L · 36.3% of games
3.5
0%
0W–19L · 23% of games
5.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 31.7% of games
6.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 31.6% of games
3.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 48.8% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 59% of the time
#3 Doubles
59%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe