MARY GALLAGHER
129 matches · 44W–85L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add MARY GALLAGHER to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history129 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-4
Teams38 teams · 2022–2027
CHI E 18W3.5 15.Gnbk Walsh Sun 3 $30
CHI E M40.7.0 1.Wilm Mesh Sat 5 $20
CDTA E 40&OW3.5 10Glen Chern Sat 3 $30
CDTA E 55&OW7.0 1MTC Brown Fri 7 $33.5
CDTA E M40&O7.0 3Cent Mesh Sat 11 $20
CDTA S 18&OW3.5 9.Gnbk Chern Tues 6:30 $30
CDTA S 40&OW3.5 7.Gnbk Chern Thu 6:30 $30
CDTA S ComboX6.5 1.Wilm Mesh Sat 9 $20
CDTA S M40&O7.0 3.Wilm Mesh Fri 7 $20
CDTA W 18&OW3.5 12.Gnbk Chern Sun 3 $30
CDTA W ComboX6.5 2.Wlmt Mesh Sat 11 $20
CDTA W M40&O7.0 2.Wlmt Mesh Sat 11 $20
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 52.2% of games
3.0
44%
22W–28L · 50.9% of games
3.5
0%
0W–9L · 32.2% of games
7.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 40.7% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 44.6% of games
6.5mixed
50%
11W–11L · 48% of games
7.0mixed
7.1%
1W–13L · 28.3% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
32 matches
#1 Singles
19%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
14 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.