← Search

Ashley Sajadi

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 51W–34L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Ashley Sajadi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-09-12 · SHC-Christensen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kamran Sajadi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with SHAWNA THOMPSON championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-20 · Ace Ace Baby · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elicia Putnam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-10 · Ace Ace Baby · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with SHAWNA THOMPSON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-09 · Ace Ace Baby · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with SHAWNA THOMPSON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Rachel Medrano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Lucila Griesser championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-16 · SHC-Thompson/Sajadi · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-02 · SHC-Thompson/Sajadi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel Medrano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · SHC-Christensen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with SHAWNA THOMPSON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-05 · SHC-Christensen · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-04 · SHC-Thompson/Sajadi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Macadam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 67% of games
3.0
72.3%
34W–13L · 57.1% of games
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.4% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
26.3%
5W–14L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
50 matches
#1 Singles
13%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer