← Search

Esther Kang

Pittsburgh, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 60W–24L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Esther Kang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
W
2026-07-29 · PTA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Diulus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · PTA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Diulus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
Campbell Priemer / Amanda Rhoads
2026-07-18 · Glen Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Diulus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-23 · PTA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Lichtenstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-09 · PTA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Lichtenstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · Glen Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Diulus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-03 · PTA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Diulus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-30 · Glen Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Diulus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-20 · PTA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Diulus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · Glen Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Diulus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
Heidi Dinucci / Kate Wilson
2026-05-13 · PTA · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Diulus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-01-03 · PTA · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Haley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 45.8% of games
3.0
75%
9W–3L · 57.6% of games
3.5
90%
9W–1L · 76.7% of games
4.0
81.6%
31W–7L · 62.2% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 43.4% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 68.3% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.5% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert