← Search

Tyler Karlen

— year-end
23 matches · 16W–7L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Tyler Karlen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ron Underwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-13 · Terrell Mill (John Elder)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory McAfee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-13 · Fullers Park (John Elder)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Fleiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 7-5
L
2025-06-29 · Fullers Park (John Elder)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 4-5
W
2025-06-22 · Fullers Park (John Elder)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
Brandon Miller / Ryan Daly
2025-06-08 · Fullers Park (John Elder)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mikiel Arnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-06-01 · Fullers Park (John Elder)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Elder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 6-3
L
Stan Butler / Sharlles Menezes
2024-07-14 · Indian Hills (Kevin Murray)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael OBrien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-02 · Indian Hills (Kevin Murray)* · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 6-3
W
2024-01-13 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2023-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael OBrien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 6-2
W
Jamie Brocard
2023-07-11 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams3 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
75%
12W–4L · 59.4% of games
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 39% of the time
#2 Singles
39%
9 matches
#1 Singles
22%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer