← Search

Daniel Hosker

Minneapolis, MN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
13 matches · 5W–8L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Daniel Hosker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history13 matches
W
2025-12-18 · Chandler · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Douglas Burger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-04 · Chandler · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Koplin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-13 · Chandler · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ram Rajagopalan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-06 · Chandler · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Koplin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-23 · Chandler · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Curtis Chandler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-02-20 · Chandler · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ted Kisner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-02-17 · Smetana-Fling Matchpoint 3.5 Winter 2025 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taras Karkoc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-02-10 · Smetana-Fling Matchpoint 3.5 Winter 2025 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Junkyu Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-01-30 · Chandler · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Roger Yang / Jared Satrom
2024-12-02 · Smetana-Fling Matchpoint · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Smetana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2024-11-14 · Chandler · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Capirchio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2024-11-11 · Smetana-Fling Matchpoint · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Smetana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 46.6% of games
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
4 matches
#1 Singles
8%
1 match
#2 Doubles
8%
1 match
#2 Singles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova