← Search

Emily McHarg

Washington, DC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 36W–27L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Emily McHarg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-08-01 · Queen Bees · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-3
W
2026-07-26 · Queen Bees · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-3
W
2026-07-19 · Queen Bees · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-27 · Queen Bees · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-2
L
2026-02-07 · The Boys & the Bees · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Peter Sullivan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-11 · The Boys & the Bees · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cameron Hunter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-12-07 · Boys & Bees · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brian Szeto mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-11 · Boys & Bees · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kole Koontz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-05 · Boys & Bees · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cameron Hunter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-3
W
2025-09-21 · Boys & Bees · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Peter Sullivan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-09-14 · Killer Bees · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-09-14 · Killer Bees · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Acero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
59%
23W–16L · 54.2% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 56.2% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 67.9% of games
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 74.4% of games
6.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
23 matches
#1 Singles
25%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
11 matches
#2 Singles
13%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer