← Search

Matt Essman

— year-end
146 matches · 108W–38L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Matt Essman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history146 matches
W
2026-08-16 · Super Balls (Hardebeck) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Graves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-14 · Tulloch/Albrecht · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harold Nottingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-5
W
2026-07-07 · Tulloch/Albrecht · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harold Nottingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · Tulloch/Albrecht · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerry Kinnaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · Super Balls (Hardebeck) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Graves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Tulloch/Albrecht · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harold Nottingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-07 · Super Balls (Hardebeck) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Graves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
Peter Kim / Eric Wonsidler
2026-06-02 · Tulloch/Albrecht · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerry Kinnaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · Tulloch/Albrecht · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · Williams (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harold Nottingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-19 · Williams (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerry Kinnaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-04-12 · Williams (S) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harold Nottingham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Teams29 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 60.2% of games
3.0
73.8%
31W–11L · 61.9% of games
3.5
82%
41W–9L · 62% of games
4.0
54.5%
18W–15L · 52.6% of games
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 73.5% of games
7.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 60.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
32 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert