← Search

Amanda Maddox

Louisville, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 69W–23L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Amanda Maddox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-09-04 · KY/LOU/BERRY/WALLITSCH · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelsie Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/JACKSON · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Annie Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-22 · KY/LOU/BERRY/WALLITSCH · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Murr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-08-20 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL (NPC) · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · KY/LOU/Bauer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Roby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/GORDINIER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josiah Wall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
Carmen Schreiber / Kathleen Berghausen
2026-08-07 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/JACKSON · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Whitney Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/GORDINIER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Link mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-24 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL (NPC) · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-23 · KY/LOU/Bauer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Knific
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-16 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/GORDINIER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cedric Boutin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-09 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL (NPC) · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
83.3%
30W–6L · 65.8% of games
4.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 51% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 60.3% of games
8.5
100%
8W–0L · 66.2% of games
4.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 70.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 24% of the time
#2 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
21 matches
#2 Singles
23%
21 matches
#1 Singles
17%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
10 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal