MARY DAMKROGER
60 matches · 41W–19L · seasons 2025–2027
Captains: add MARY DAMKROGER to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history60 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Karen Saland / Jennifer Hull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Teams39 teams · 2022–2027
Team 11 Bob Day/Young W4.0S
Team 15 Spring Park/Bradley W4.0F
Team 27 Spring Park/Nolen-Harvey W3.5S
Bob Day TC/Young W4.0S
Jack Coleman/Smith-Bradley W4.0F
Spring Park/Bradley W4.0F
Spring Park/Bradley W4.0T
Spring Park/Bradley W7.0
Spring Park/Bradley W8.0
Spring Park/Martinez-Lindsay W7.0
Spring Park/Nolen W3.5S
Team 3 Cheryl Bradley 7.5W
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
70%
14W–6L · 60.1% of games
4.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 42.6% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
100%
18W–0L · 66.7% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 49.3% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#1 Singles
15%
9 matches
#2 Singles
8%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.