← Search

Scott Hodgson

— year-end
87 matches · 57W–30L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Scott Hodgson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-07-29 · CRRC Silver Smashers 55+ 6.0M · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeffrey Moskowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-21 · #3 Doubles · with Gregg Gelman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · CRRC Dirt Ballers 40+ 3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gregg Gelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-10 · CRRC Silver Smashers 55+ 6.0M · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeffrey Moskowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-27 · CRRC Dirt Ballers 40+ 3.5M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc Roth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-08 · Chestnut Silver Mixed Smashers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Rose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-09-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Breakstone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-07-15 · Chestnut Ridge Racquet Club: 55 Yari's Autonomics · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with R Peter Sanchez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-07-09 · CRRC: Dirt Ballers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Frank Loverro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-23 · CRRC: Dirt Ballers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Slotoroff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-06-18 · CRRC: Dirt Ballers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Tierney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-11 · CRRC: Dirt Ballers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc Roth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 65.1% of games
3.5
52.2%
12W–11L · 49.2% of games
6.0
100%
4W–0L · 77.4% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.6% of games
6.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 59.9% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer