Lauren Nonos
30 matches · 7W–23L · seasons 2023–2025
Captains: add Lauren Nonos to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history30 matches
L
Amber Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Elizabeth Williams / Amanda Helfrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
Teams18 teams · 2022–2025
KY/LOU/AGIN/MCGLONE
KY/LOU/FRENCH/WILSON
KY/LOU/MCGLONE/KEEHAN
KY/LOU/MCGLONE/KEEHAN
KY/LOU/MCGLONE/KEEHAN
KY/LOU/MCGLONE/KEEHAN
KY/LOU/SENCINDIVER
KY/LOU/SHEEHAN
KY/LOU/MCGLONE/KEEHAN
KY/LOU/STEWART
KY/LOU/WALLITSCH
KY/LOU/WALLITSCH
KY/LOU/WALLITSCH/MCGLONE
KY/LOU/DAVIS/KEEHAN
KY/LOU/FUCHS/RICHARDSON
KY/LOU/MCCAULEY
KY/LOU/Mojesky
KY/LOU/WALLITSCH
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
23.8%
5W–16L · 37.7% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 27.9% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.8% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
5 matches
#1 Singles
13%
4 matches
#2 Singles
10%
3 matches
#3 Singles
3%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.