← Search

Connie Manson

Mercer Island, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 9W–11L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Connie Manson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
W
2026-05-27 · MI-Condiotty 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-05-06 · MI-Condiotty 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mina Laban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-10 · MI-Condiotty 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria McBride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-01 · MI-Condiotty 3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mina Laban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-07 · MI-Simply Smashing-Nielsen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria McBride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-6
L
2026-02-27 · MI-Simply Smashing-Nielsen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mindy Rowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-21 · MI-Simply Smashing-Nielsen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Selamawit Engda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-01-31 · MI-Simply Smashing-Nielsen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mindy Rowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-24 · MI-Simply Smashing-Nielsen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Selamawit Engda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-09 · MI-Simply Smashing-Nielsen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mindy Rowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-10-11 · MI-Double Trouble-Chang · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Shaz Qadeer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-09-28 · MI-Double Trouble-Chang · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Varun Kamat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.9% of games
3.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.2% of games
5.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova