← Search

Barney Akierman

Sarasota, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 71W–46L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Barney Akierman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
W
2026-08-11 · TPC Risquez · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steven Totterdale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-27 · #2 Doubles · with Joe Malave championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-21 · TPC Risquez · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steven Totterdale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · TPC Risquez · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steven Totterdale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-07-09 · Laurel Oak Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bradley Sutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · TPC Akierman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Natalie Bloch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · Laurel Oak Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Rosenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · TPC Akierman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tanya Keith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-31 · TPC Akierman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tanya Keith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · TPC Akierman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Natalie Bloch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Laurel Oak Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Malave
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-20 · Laurel Oak Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Malave
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 57.2% of games
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 52.9% of games
7.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 61.4% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
87.5%
14W–2L · 63.9% of games
8.0mixed
45.7%
16W–19L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
14 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
8%
9 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
5%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams