← Search

Liesl Rademeyer

— year-end
75 matches · 49W–26L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Liesl Rademeyer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-09-04 · Chenet/55/6.5/CW/LCRC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joelyn Doland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Chenet/55/6.5/CW/LCRC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marlene Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-02 · Lanier/40/4.0/TRI/LCRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephannie Tanner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-26 · Lanier/40/4.0/TRI/LCRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Clements
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · Mack/55/MX/LCRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marty DeRouen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-05 · Mack/55/MX/LCRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Stout mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · Mack/55/MX/LCRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marty DeRouen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Clements
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Crystal Pappion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-01 · Rademeyer/40/3.5/WD/LCRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana MacK
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Clements
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Holleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Teams39 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 62.2% of games
3.5
67.7%
21W–10L · 55.4% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 54.9% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 67.1% of games
3.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova