← Search

Jill Kehl

Glastonbury, CT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 70W–41L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jill Kehl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-06-24 · MLM:Summer Match Points:Lincer/Sheffield · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-08 · MLM:Summer Match Points:Lincer/Sheffield · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Isabela Piza Danielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · GTC:All Set:Bonin/Fromson · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-07 · GTC:I'd Hit That:Kehl/Gallagher · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Britt Miglietta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-07 · GTC:All Set:Bonin/Fromson · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · GTC:All Set:Bonin/Fromson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen McDonough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · GTC:Vargas/Hassett · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hillary Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-02-19 · BTC:Honey Deuces:Wright/Cushman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Genna Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-10 · GTC:I'd Hit That:Kehl/Gallagher · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tanya Perham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-01-31 · GTC:All Set:Bonin/Fromson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Roxane Fromson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-10 · GTC:All Set:Bonin/Fromson · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-01-08 · BTC:Honey Deuces:Wright/Cushman · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
67.1%
55W–27L · 58% of games
3.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 48.6% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova