← Search

Vanessa Weber

Ridgefield, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 60W–36L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Vanessa Weber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
2026-09-12 · CRRC-Jacobsen · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chase Stowell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-20 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-17 · High Strung · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-06 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with THAO VAN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-31 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Snieder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-23 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julia Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-17 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bailee Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-09 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Mader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-09 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Pultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-10 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Ash · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julia Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-04 · CRRC-Jacobsen/Gill · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bailee Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
85.7%
18W–3L · 66.7% of games
3.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 49.8% of games
7.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 62.1% of games
6.0mixed
90.5%
19W–2L · 66.7% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
6W–15L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
14 matches
#1 Female Doubles
14%
13 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
6%
6 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe