Raul Larrousse
Apopka, FL
182 matches · 115W–67L · seasons 2023–2026
Captains: add Raul Larrousse to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history182 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Luke Anderson / Megan McAloon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
Natalie Martinez / Felipe Martinez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
73.7%
28W–10L · 60% of games
4.0
63.4%
26W–15L · 53.9% of games
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.7% of games
7.5
75%
12W–4L · 59.4% of games
8.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 50.8% of games
8.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 43.4% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
39 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.