← Search

Hamid Sheikhghanbari

Sammamish, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 56W–33L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Hamid Sheikhghanbari to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
L
2026-07-18 · EDG-Après Tennis-To · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Higgins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-05 · EDG-Après Tennis-To · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Higgins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · EDG-Après Tennis-To · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Higgins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-22 · EDG-Larson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-09 · EDG-Alcohooligans 4.0-Cook · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Waldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-08 · EDG-Larson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Loic Deniel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-24 · EDG-Alcohooligans 4.0-Cook · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-18 · EDG-Larson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Loic Deniel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-28 · EDG-Alcohooligans 4.0-Cook · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-03-07 · EDG-Kilambi · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Waldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-06 · EDG-Kilambi · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Waldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-01-24 · EDG-Kilambi · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rajive Kilambi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
89.5%
17W–2L · 65.5% of games
4.0
51.6%
16W–15L · 52.3% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
100%
8W–0L · 73.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 48.6% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
16 matches
#1 Male Doubles
7%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Male Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer