← Search

Martha Dixon

— year-end
48 matches · 38W–10L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Martha Dixon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-08-31 · Johnson-CC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · Johnson-CC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dayna Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-27 · Johnson-CC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Hrach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · Johnson-CC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dayna Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · Johnson-CC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dayna Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · CORTA/Natalie Morris · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with India Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Vicki Hendrix / Jennifer Boyd
2026-04-06 · CORTA/Natalie Morris · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alix Toelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-09 · Johnson-CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dayna Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · Johnson-CC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-03-07 · Juestel/Medders-CC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-04 · Johnson-CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dayna Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-03-03 · Johnson-CC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dayna Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
Teams26 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 60% of games
3.0
100%
7W–0L · 75.7% of games
3.5
75%
18W–6L · 57% of games
4.0
50%
4W–4L · 46.7% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#2 Singles
17%
8 matches
#1 Singles
10%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert