Mark Eickelbeck
73 matches · 39W–34L · seasons 2022–2026
Captains: add Mark Eickelbeck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history73 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Teams18 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
80%
12W–3L · 58.1% of games
3.5
46.7%
14W–16L · 46.9% of games
6.0
100%
4W–0L · 73.1% of games
7.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 56.6% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 38.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
19 matches
#1 Singles
7%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.