← Search

Dory Simons

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 68W–31L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Dory Simons to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Desiree Bliss championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Faith Beers / Karen Pan
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Desiree Bliss championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Megan Miller / Nicole Loeffler
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Tammy Cofield championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-26 · THPRD-Omlid · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Garrahan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-27 · THPRD-Omlid · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Garrahan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Desiree Bliss championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Desiree Bliss championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-19 · THPRD-Omlid · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Omlid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-14 · THPRD-Omlid · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Garrahan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-12 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · with Fenn Bourland championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-17 · NOR-MAC-Lamprecht · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Desiree Bliss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.1% of games
3.0
87.5%
14W–2L · 63.9% of games
3.5
74.1%
20W–7L · 59.1% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 41.6% of games
7.0
100%
5W–0L · 68.7% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 61% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
16 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer