← Search

Julie Baranowski

— year-end
25 matches · 16W–9L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Julie Baranowski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
L
2026-06-17 · Gordon/40/3-3.5-4/TWD/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin McCoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-03-31 · Rodgers-Smith/18/3.0/WD/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-24 · Rodgers-Smith/18/3.0/WD/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-03-23 · Gonzalez/40/3.0/WN/BTC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-22 · Rodgers-Smith/18/3.0/WD/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-05 · Gordon-Douglas/40/3.5/WN/BTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-03-02 · Gonzalez/40/3.0/WN/BTC · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-26 · Gordon-Douglas/40/3.5/WN/BTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Patton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-19 · Gordon-Douglas/40/3.5/WN/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hailey Broussard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-17 · Rodgers-Smith/18/3.0/WD/BTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hailey Broussard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-16 · Gonzalez/40/3.0/WN/BTC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Harrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-10-22 · Gordon/40/6.5/WCN/BTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hailey Broussard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 63% of games
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 45.6% of games
6.5
60%
3W–2L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
14 matches
#1 Singles
20%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer