← Search

Stephanie ONeal

— year-end
56 matches · 35W–21L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Stephanie ONeal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-08-20 · LCTA40/Arthur/Creekside · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-11 · LCTA18/Boyd/Creekside · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hannah Holena
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
Emily Moore / Brenda Hair
2026-07-07 · LCTA18/Boyd/Creekside · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stacey Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-06 · LCTA40/Chapman/Creekside · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-05 · LCTA18/Murphy/MPR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with McRae Hogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-29 · LCTA18/Murphy/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Claypoole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · LCTA40/Chapman/Creekside · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katey Deas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-10 · LCTA18/Murphy/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madison Wist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-01 · LCTA18/Murphy/MPR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-03-12 · LCTA18/Hiers-Boyd/Creekside · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Frost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W
Andrea Martin / Emily Calcagno
2026-02-22 · LCTA40/Urbanic/Creekside · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-02-19 · LCTA18/Hiers-Boyd/Creekside · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Currie Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams13 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 56% of games
3.0
69%
20W–9L · 62.6% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 37.5% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#1 Singles
11%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal