Makiko Coakley
65 matches · 31W–34L · seasons 2022–2026
Captains: add Makiko Coakley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history65 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Teams27 teams · 2022–2027
CP:Over the Net:Abbazia/Kornstein
INT:Sweet Slices:Murray/Linder
MIL: Over Served: Gonzalez
TRC:Smash Charmers:Chen
TRC:Smash Girls:Sizer/Flynn
TRC:Smash Raptors:Chen
WRC:One Hit Wonders:Hamelin
CP: Over the Net and Fabulous 55+:Abbazia/Hager
INT: Mixed Nuts:Donnelly
INT:Mixed Nuts:Donnelly
INT:Serves Up!:Donnelly
INT:Slice Girls: Seigner/Cannavino
INT:Sweet Slices:Murray
TRC:Ace It Up:Day
TRC:Smash Charmers: Chen
TRC:Tri 3.0:Gonzalez
WRC: Mixed Nuts: Hamelin/Eliseenkova
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.2% of games
3.0
42.9%
15W–20L · 47% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 60% of games
7.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 39.4% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Singles, 55% of the time
#1 Singles
55%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
6 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.