← Search

Edward Ng

Fort Lauderdale, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 67W–47L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Edward Ng to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2026-07-30 · Veltri/Sasson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ravi Seeram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
Grant DEPENBROCK / Egor Frantsevskiy
2026-07-23 · Veltri/Sasson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arturo Garcia Alcocer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · Veltri/Sasson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ravi Seeram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · Broward/Sengupta · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nadezhda Taran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-01 · Veltri/Goldstein · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Mandell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-20 · Broward/Sengupta · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Picanza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-18 · Veltri/Goldstein · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-11 · Veltri/Goldstein · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Connor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-08 · Sengupta (Trump National) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rai Montero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-06 · Veltri/Goldstein · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vincent Zarrella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-05 · Broward/Sengupta · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christine Picanza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-04 · Veltri/Goldstein · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theodore Brill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
62.1%
18W–11L · 51.8% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
64.4%
38W–21L · 57% of games
7.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
26 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert