← Search

Michelle Craddock

— year-end
131 matches · 106W–25L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Michelle Craddock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
W
Kurran Singh / Allison Haynes
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · with Wade Tucker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · with Wade Tucker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · with Alex Wellems championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · with Wade Tucker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · with Douglas E Richardson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · with Michael Proothi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-20 · LI: Deer Park, Chua-McAlonie/Laible · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Atul Singh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-17 · LI: Park Ave, Siegel · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas E Richardson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · LI: Deer Park, Chua-McAlonie/Laible · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Keith Lopez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · LI: Deer Park, Chua-McAlonie/Laible · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dan Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-22 · LI: Park Ave, Siegel · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Proothi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-14 · LI: Deer Park, Chua-McAlonie/Laible · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Atul Singh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
Teams25 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.6% of games
9.0
100%
4W–0L · 62.7% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 68.8% of games
8.0mixed
86.5%
32W–5L · 68.6% of games
9.0mixed
83.3%
30W–6L · 63.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
14 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer