← Search

Brenda Cheng

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 58W–40L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Brenda Cheng to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
W
2026-06-26 · PSC-Yasutake · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mihai Petriuc mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-14 · PSC-Yasutake · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yi Sun mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-6
L
2026-06-07 · PSC-Cheng · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edie Mei
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-23 · PSC-Cheng · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yi Cao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-17 · PSC-Cheng · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Boris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-15 · PSC-Cheng · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irina Petriuc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-26 · PSC-Cheng · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irina Petriuc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-02-21 · PSC-Cheng · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Boris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-02-06 · PSC-Cheng · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mayret Talonia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-01-31 · PSC-Cheng · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Boris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-24 · PSC-Cheng · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nan Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-16 · PSC-Cheng · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jing Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
70%
14W–6L · 58.7% of games
3.5
34.6%
9W–17L · 45.5% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 52% of games
6.0mixed
78.6%
22W–6L · 59.9% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#1 Singles
14%
14 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe