← Search

Katarina Jacquemard

— year-end
43 matches · 36W–7L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Katarina Jacquemard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-09-11 · RTC CATES · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Priscila Vidal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · RTC WILLIAMS/JACQUEMARD · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-12 · RTC WILLIAMS/JACQUEMARD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dina Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Jill Johnson
2026-04-03 · CCP CAUWELS/HEITZ · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Natalie Gilbert
2026-03-22 · RTC CATES · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-03-13 · CCP CAUWELS/HEITZ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Daly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-01 · CCP ASAAD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Melissa Johnson / Christine Hooper
2026-02-21 · RTC CATES · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Parsons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-20 · CCP CAUWELS/HEITZ · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-19 · CCP ASAAD · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-02-09 · CCP ASAAD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Audrey Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-08 · CCP ASAAD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Teams29 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
88.2%
30W–4L · 65.7% of games
4.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#1 Singles
30%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova